Цитробактер браакии

Note that changes will be reviewed and judged. If your changes are legitimate, changes will occur within the next Bac Dive update. Only proposed changes supported by the according reference will be reviewed. The Bac Dive team reserves the right to reject proposed changes.

Affiliation

• 1 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and Paul F. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso Texas, 1205 Oregon, El Paso, Texas 79902, TX. United States.

• PMID: 27658860
• DOI: 10.2174/1871526516666161005155847

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Authors

Affiliation

• 1 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and Paul F. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso Texas, 1205 Oregon, El Paso, Texas 79902, TX. United States.

• PMID: 27658860
• DOI: 10.2174/1871526516666161005155847

Abstract

Bacteremia is frequently caused by gram-positive organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus or β hemolytic streptococci. While there is adequate information for the diagnosis and management of these common bacteria, less information is available to address bacteremia that is caused by uncommon bacteria such as Citrobacter. Citrobacter species are gram-negative bacilli that have been noted to cause infections in immune compromised patients. The re-speciation of Citrobacter by its varied genetic composition has produced 11 distinct species. While C. braakii is part of the genome species 6 of the previous Citrobacter freundii complex, there is a lack of definitive research on the subject of Citrobacter bacteremia caused by lesser- known species. We report an unusual case of Citrobacter braakii bacteremia in a patient with multiple comorbidities that presented to the hospital with cellulitis and pleural effusion. Blood cultures grew Citrobacter braakii. Despite good response to antibiotic treatment, the patient’s infection proved to be persistent and he succumbed to the cirrhosis of the liver and subsequent renal failure. Multiple and fatal underlying disease processes seem to worsen the likelihood of recovery from unusual infections. We believe our case report can add to the limited data available for C. braakii.

Keywords: Bacteremia; antibiotic treatment; citrobacter braaki; gram-negative; gram-positive organisms; staphylococcus.

qnrB30

Annotation score:1 out of 5

The annotation score provides a heuristic measure of the annotation content of a UniProtKB entry or proteome. This score cannot be used as a measure of the accuracy of the annotation as we cannot define the ‘correct annotation’ for any given protein.

— Protein predicted i

This indicates the type of evidence that supports the existence of the protein. Note that the ‘protein existence’ evidence does not give information on the accuracy or correctness of the sequence(s) displayed.

Select a section on the left to see content.

This section provides information about the protein and gene name(s) and synonym(s) and about the organism that is the source of the protein sequence.

Names & Taxonomy i

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section provides an exhaustive list of all names of the protein, from commonly used to obsolete, to allow unambiguous identification of a protein.

Information which has been imported from another database using automatic procedures.

Automatic assertion inferred from database entries i

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section indicates the name(s) of the gene(s) that code for the protein sequence(s) described in the entry. Four distinct tokens exist: ‘Name’, ‘Synonyms’, ‘Ordered locus names’ and ‘ORF names’.

Automatic assertion inferred from database entries i

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section indicates if the gene coding for the protein originates from the hydrogenosome, the mitochondrion, the nucleomorph, different plastids or a plasmid. The absence of this section means that the gene is located in one of the main chromosomal element(s).

Automatic assertion inferred from database entries i

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section provides information on the name(s) of the organism that is the source of the protein sequence.

Automatic assertion inferred from database entries i

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section shows the unique identifier assigned by the NCBI to the source organism of the protein. This is known as the ‘taxonomic identifier’ or ‘taxid’.

This subsection of the Names and taxonomy section contains the taxonomic hierarchical classification lineage of the source organism. It lists the nodes as they appear top-down in the taxonomic tree, with the more general grouping listed first.

This section provides information on sequence similarities with other proteins and the domain(s) present in a protein.

Family & Domains i

Phylogenomic databases

KEGG Orthology (KO)

Family and domain databases

Integrated resource of protein families, domains and functional sites

Pfam protein domain database

This section displays by default the canonical protein sequence and upon request all isoforms described in the entry. It also includes information pertinent to the sequence(s), including length and molecular weight. The information is filed in different subsections. The current subsections and their content are listed below:

This subsection of the Sequence section indicates if the canonical sequence displayed by default in the entry is complete or not.

Sequence status i : Complete.

The checksum is a form of redundancy check that is calculated from the sequence. It is useful for tracking sequence updates.

It should be noted that while, in theory, two different sequences could have the same checksum value, the likelihood that this would happen is extremely low.

However UniProtKB may contain entries with identical sequences in case of multiple genes (paralogs).

The checksum is computed as the sequence 64-bit Cyclic Redundancy Check value (CRC64) using the generator polynomial: x 64 + x 4 + x 3 + x + 1. The algorithm is described in the ISO 3309 standard.

Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A. and Vetterling W.T.
Cyclic redundancy and other checksums
Numerical recipes in C 2nd ed., pp896-902, Cambridge University Press (1993))

Checksum: i C2A9B2822F341D65

Sequence databases

EMBL nucleotide sequence database

GenBank nucleotide sequence database

DNA Data Bank of Japan; a nucleotide sequence database

Genome annotation databases

KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

This section provides links to proteins that are similar to the protein sequence(s) described in this entry at different levels of sequence identity thresholds (100%, 90% and 50%) based on their membership in UniProt Reference Clusters (UniRef).

Similar proteins i

• 100% Identity
• 90% Identity
• 50% Identity

This section is used to point to information related to entries and found in data collections other than UniProtKB.

Sequence databases

3D structure databases

Database of comparative protein structure models

SWISS-MODEL Interactive Workspace

Genome annotation databases

Phylogenomic databases

Family and domain databases

ProtoNet; Automatic hierarchical classification of proteins

MobiDB: a database of protein disorder and mobility annotations

This section provides general information on the entry.

Entry information i

This subsection of the ‘Entry information’ section provides a mnemonic identifier for a UniProtKB entry, but it is not a stable identifier. Each reviewed entry is assigned a unique entry name upon integration into UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot.

This subsection of the ‘Entry information’ section provides one or more accession number(s). These are stable identifiers and should be used to cite UniProtKB entries. Upon integration into UniProtKB, each entry is assigned a unique accession number, which is called ‘Primary (citable) accession number’.

This subsection of the ‘Entry information’ section shows the date of integration of the entry into UniProtKB, the date of the last sequence update and the date of the last annotation modification (‘Last modified’). The version number for both the entry and the canonical sequence are also displayed.

This subsection of the ‘Entry information’ section indicates whether the entry has been manually annotated and reviewed by UniProtKB curators or not, in other words, if the entry belongs to the Swiss-Prot section of UniProtKB (reviewed) or to the computer-annotated TrEMBL section (unreviewed).

This section contains any relevant information that doesn’t fit in any other defined sections

UniProtKB Keywords constitute a controlled vocabulary with a hierarchical structure. Keywords summarise the content of a UniProtKB entry and facilitate the search for proteins of interest.

Keywords — Technical term i

Automatic assertion inferred from database entries i

Tools

• BLAST
• Align
• Retrieve/ID mapping
• Peptide search

Core data

• Protein knowledgebase (UniProtKB)
• Sequence clusters (UniRef)
• Sequence archive (UniParc)
• Proteomes

Supporting data

• Literature citations
• Taxonomy
• Keywords
• Subcellular locations
• Cross-referenced databases
• Diseases

Information

• About UniProt
• Help
• FAQ
• UniProtKB manual
• Technical corner
• Expert biocuration

UniProt is an ELIXIR core data resource

We’d like to inform you that we have updated our Privacy Notice to comply with Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that applies since 25 May 2018.